stats:
Longrow CV, single malt scotch, Campbeltown, 46%, $60
(200ml pictured,
average price for 750ml shown)
Longrow Living Cask, single malt scotch, Campbeltown, 49.2%,
$70.40
(350ml pictured,
price for 700ml shown)
As I mentioned last week, Longrow single malt was first
produced at the Springbank Distillery in 1973. But it was certainly not the
first time a whisky of that name had emerged from Campbeltown. The original
Longrow distillery, a former next-door neighbor to Springbank, was in operation
from 1824-1896 (Springbank had its start in 1828). In fact, two of the former
Longrow warehouses still stand to this day, and are being put to good use by
Springbank, one as Warehouse #15, and the other as their bottling hall. The
Springbank employee parking lot is located on the site of the original Longrow
still-house. When the name was put back into use in 1973, I believe it was as a
tip of the hat to the town’s rich distilling history.
As I continue my Longrow tasting, I’m moving on to the CV and
the Living Cask. CV stands for Curriculum
Vitae, and in common usage the term is essentially the European equivalent of a
resume. It loosely translates from Latin as the
course of my life. When I first heard about this whisky, I mistakenly
thought CV stood for Cask Variety. In actuality, that is essentially what we
have here; a marriage of 6yr, 10yr and 14yr, coming from bourbon, rum, port and
sherry casks.
The Living Cask
bottlings are fairly special, as they can only be purchased at the Caddenhead’s
store in Campbeltown. The four casks (Springbank, Longrow, Hazelburn and
Kilkerran) are kept in the shop, and bottles are filled from a spigot in the
side of the each cask. More single malt is periodically added to each cask as
needed.
The Living Cask
bottle that I have is particularly special to me. Apparently my overly
inquisitive nature earned me the honor of being named “star pupil” of the Springbank Whisky School
session which I attended. For this I was awarded a 35cl bottle from the Living
Cask of my choice. It was only a matter of moments before I settled on the
Longrow.
Filling that bottle was one of the last things that I did at
whisky school, so I didn’t really have a chance to gather any info about the
Living Cask program. I recently sent an email off to the Caddenhead’s shop
manager asking him to shed some light on the subject. Grant got right back to
me with the following response:
The 4 casks in the
tasting room are what we call living casks. The Longrow has an average age of
around 12 years old (sometimes it may be topped up with 10Y/O or maybe 14Y/O)
as it works on a solera system where we keep topping the cask up before it
reaches the tap. (the tap being half way up the cask). Every month or after we
top up the cask we will check the strength. The whisky is selected by the
Distillery Manager and could be from various cask types Bourbon, Sherry etc,
but the Longrow is mostly from Bourbon.
My curious disposition being what it is, I had a few
follow-up questions:
The bottle that I have
is at 49.2 abv, which seems low for a 12yr at cask strength. Is that because
the abv continues to drop as the whisky spends time in the living cask, or do
you sometimes add whisky that is surplus from a bottling run and has been
diluted down to 46%?
Also, can you tell me about the living casks themselves (size, type of wood), and do they contribute much to the flavor of the whisky, or are they casks that have been used several times previously and just act mostly as containers now?
Also, can you tell me about the living casks themselves (size, type of wood), and do they contribute much to the flavor of the whisky, or are they casks that have been used several times previously and just act mostly as containers now?
Unfortunately, I never got a response to that email, so the
subject still retains some of its mystery.
CV
nose – The peat has a slight floral aspect to it, overall
there is more depth / layering of aromas, presenting a subtle complexity
palate – The body is as viscous as the first two. There’s a
quick blast of a floral element up front which quickly gives way to smoke and
heat – another sustained attack marches into the finish, with a level of
intensity that lies closer to the 10 than the 14. Warming spice notes build
through finish, adding depth.
finish – again, very long. Beach fire and brine, but with a
hint of licorice mixed in.
Living Cask
nose – I thought the higher abv might provide more intense
aromas, but in that respect it is similar to the CV. The olfactory notes are a
little different though, with aromas that are less floral and perhaps leaning
more toward heather.
palate – The thick-of-body theme continues through to the
last sample. While the greater alcohol level failed to bolster the nose, it
certainly seems to enhance the palate. The Living Cask shares a similar potency
to the 10 year, but while the 10 has tannic oak and sweetness contrasting the
peat smoke, the intensity of the Living Cask is more peat-centric, and it seems
to be the driest of the bunch.
finish – Rather than fading gently though the finish as the
others do, it seems to hold its phenolic intensity until quite late in the
game.
Overall conclusion:
The 14yr is the most gentle (and refined)
of the bunch, and while the other three share a higher level of intensity, each
does so in its own unique way - the 10 yr with a fruit/nutty/oak richness, the
CV with its floral/spicy character, and the Living Cask with dry peat smoke as
the main player, buttressed by its slightly higher abv. I’m not one to assign
scores on a 100 point scale, but if I were to do so here I think that the latter
three offerings would be within a point or two of each other, and the 14yr a
solid five points ahead of the bunch.
No comments:
Post a Comment